Showing posts with label Allen Christensen. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Allen Christensen. Show all posts

Saturday, January 23, 2010

SB 36 -- Maybe We Should Hunt Republicans Next

(I want to be clear -- I do not condone the hunting of Republicans.)

Sometimes, there's a story about a bill that's so good, it just needs commenting....

From the Tribune:

Wolves are out of control, says Utah Sen. Allen Christensen, and the state's policy should be to kill them. Heck, he did. Went to Canada to bag one. It's at the taxidermist.

And besides, Christensen says, passing a bill to declare Utah's policy to destroy or remove all wolves is a simple case of states' rights.

The North Ogden Republican's goal is spelled out in SB36, which has caught the attention of legislative attorneys who attached a rare warning that the bill, if passed, probably would be found unconstitutional.


Screw the Constitution!

"Will it be a fight? Absolutely," Christensen concedes. "We have enough money to take it all the way to the [U.S.] Supreme Court."


Again, in this day of deep budget cuts and such, I think the AG's office has way too much money if they can afford to defend vanity bills all the way to the Supreme Court.

The Utah chapters of the Cattlemen's Association and Sportsmen for Fish & Wildlife support the bill. The Sportsmen will contribute to litigation costs, says Byron Bateman, president of the Utah chapter.

"We've been in the fight from the get-go," Bateman said, "and we'll be in it to the end."


Ah. There's where the money is coming from. And I thought it was illegal for outside groups to fund the State's defense. That seems to be an issue whenever an abortion bill comes up.

SB36 is for people who enjoy wildlife, Christensen says, adding he knows wolves are wildlife, too.


I enjoy wildlife enough to kill it unnecessarily.

But they were exterminated in this region in the 19th century "for good reason," he says. "They were simply not compatible with humans anymore."


They weren't compatible because humans showed up and decided they weren't compatible. Remember,white man settled the region in the 19th century.

And now in Utah, Christensen says, "we supposedly don't have wolves. We would like to control our borders and say wolves are not endangered. We would like them not to immigrate into here."


You see, it's an immigration issue. Dang immigrants!

But federal law trumps state law. In Utah, except for a small area included in the northern Rocky Mountain gray-wolf recovery area, wolves remain on the endangered list and under federal protection. So even if Christensen's bill were to take effect, says Ed Bangs, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service wolf-recovery chief, it wouldn't matter.

Anyone who kills a wolf without proper cause in most of Utah still could land in big trouble -- to the tune of a $100,000 fine, a year in prison and loss of the gun that killed the beast and the truck the hunter rode in.
Bangs has heard all the arguments against wolves: They've destroyed elk and moose herds in the Yellowstone region, decimated livestock, hurt ranchers financially and they are man killers -- claims that tell some of the truth about wolves but not all of it.

"People who don't like them give them supernatural powers. It's that way all over the world," Bangs says. "In reality, they're no big deal."

Wolves have contributed to a decline of elk in and around Yellowstone, but moose loss is probably more due to climate disruption. "Moose can't handle heat at all," Bangs says. "They just lie around and don't store body fat."

White-tail deer populations are stable. Weather, loss of habitat, fire and other predators, including humans, have contributed to wildlife losses. In the West, Bangs says, wolves mostly cause problems with livestock depredation.

But they don't kill people. The first documented time a wolf killed a person the federal agency knows of occurred three years ago in Canada at a mining camp where wolves had become habituated to humans who fed them and left garbage around. The wolves had become aggressive. They killed a man who was trying to get close enough to photograph them, Bangs says.

This year, Christensen says, he went to Canada to kill a wolf. "I did kill one. It's currently at the taxidermist," he says. "Wolves are wildlife, too. But they proliferate so fast."


Republicans proliferate so fast. Maybe we can hunt them, too.

-Bob

Thursday, December 27, 2007

Forced Patriotism Bill Will Do Absolutely Nothing

I sure that you have read about a plan by Sen. Allen Christensen, (R-North Ogden) to require the Declaration of Independence and US flag to be posted in every public school classroom in the state.

Well, I'm here to tell you that this is just another election year waste of time. The legislature probably will run out of time to get the puppy torture bill passed, but will pass this bill with a huge margin.

And, it's the most pointless bill in years. There aren't too many classrooms in Utah that don't have an American Flag posted. (Many are improperly posted, but given other disregard for the flag code, that probably won't change.)

And what good will it do to have the flag in EVERY classroom? I'm sure that kids know what the American flag looks like.

And for having the Declaration posted? Because kids will stop every day and read it. Memorize it even.

And, if you believe that, I've got prime real estate in western Tooele County to sell you.

And the funny thing is, even if more kids know what the flag looks like and have the Declaration of Independence memorized, it won't do what Sen Christensen set out to do.

Why?

The money Quote:

"This started off because a friend of mind did a little bit of research on college campuses and he couldn't find anybody who could tell him what the Constitution was, let alone what was in it — and these were college students," Christensen said.


Last time I checked, there was a difference between the Declaration of Independance and the Constitution......

-Bob

Friday, August 24, 2007

The Puppy Torture/People Torture Connection

A commenter on an earlier post made a comparison between Puppy Torture and People Torture.

I thought it was a stretch. I don't think do anymore...

From Out of Context:

Earlier this year, Sen. Allen Christensen took some heat for opposing a bill that would make it a felony to torture an animal. He was back during the Special Session with his own bill that critics say significantly watered down the existing law.

For example, under Christensen's bill, it would not be illegal to intentionally injure an animal, unless it involves "serious injury."

Here's how the legislation defines serious injury:

"'Serious injury' means bodily injury that: creates or causes serious permanent disfigurement; creates or causes protracted loss or impairment of the function of any bodily member or organ; creates substantial risk of death; or causes death."

That language sounded a little familiar. Let's see, where have I read that before? Oh yeah. Here:

"We conclude that for an act to constitute torture as defined in Section 2340, it must inflict pain that is difficult to endure. Physical pain amounting to torture must be equivalent to intensity to the pain accompanying serious physical injury, such as organ failure, impairment of bodily function, or even death."

That's from the now-famous "torture memo" by former Assistant Attorney General Jay Bybee that set the bar on what the Bush administration does and does not consider torture.